Tsarin tsari shine Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) model, wanda Gary Klein ya ci taro a shekara ta 1985: masana suna daidaita hali zuwa salon daga kwarewa, suna gane shi a matsayin al'ada, suna kawo tsarin aiki da ya auri a baya, kuma suna nuna shi a gaban aikin kafin su amsa. Klein, Calderwood da Clinton-Cirocco sun yi nazari kan masu gaba 26 na ƙungiyar masu gaba game da matakai 156 na yanke shawara kuma sun gano cewa a ƙasa da 12% na lokuta sun kwatanta matakai biyu ko fiye. A shekara ta 2009, Daniel Kahneman da Gary Klein sun kammala cewa hankali na masana zai iya amintarwa kawai a cikin matakai da ke da ƙarfi, tare da alamomi marasa canzawa da amsa mai kyau — yanayin da ake samu a masana'antar gaba, chess, da anesthesiology, amma ba a siyasa ko kasuwancin hannayen jari ba. Naturalistic decision making ya dace da yanayi mai sauri, gane salon, na daya; yanke shawara mai tsauri, mai matukar muhimmanci, sabon, na da yawa na masu ruwa zama'ai suna bukatar tsari. Argumentree ke goyon bayan waɗannan yanke shawara mai tsauri tare da tsarin pro/con argument trees, multi-dimensional rating wanda ke tarawa zuwa maki na amincewa, AI nishadantarwa na hujjoji, da rikodin bayanai wanda ke sa hankali na masana zai iya nazarin a maimakon a rufe shi a cikin kai daya.

Yadda masana ke yanke hukunci a cikin gini mai ƙonewa, tare da sekunde kaɗan? Ba ta hanyar kwatanta matakai — ta gane salon kuma aiki. Wannan shine naturalistic decision making.
Na karshe an sabunta: 2026-07-02
Naturalistic decision making (NDM) na karatu yadda masana ke yanke hukunci a duniyar da ba a tsara ta ba — a ƙarƙashin matsin lamba da rashin tabbas — kuma suna gane cewa masana gane matakai maimakon kwatanta. Gary Klein's Recognition-Primed Decision model shine tsarin tsari. Amma: hankali na masana zai iya amintarwa kawai a cikin yankuna da ke da ƙarfi tare da amsa mai kyau. A waje da waɗannan, kuna bukatar tsari mai tsauri — wanda ke inda kayan aiki kama su Argumentree suke.
A daya daga cikin nazari da Gary Klein ya yi (Sources of Power, 1998), laftanar ya shiga ƙungiyar sa a wani gini da ya kama wuta. Amma ruwa bai yi aikin sa ba, ɗaki ya zamo zafi fiye da wuta a ƙasar — kuma ɗaurin ya yi. Ba shi da tabbas, bai san yadda zai iya bayyana ba, ya umarci ƙungiyar sa fitowa. Minti daga baya, ɗakin ya kone: wuta ta yi a ɓangaren ƙasa ba tare da wani ya sani ba.
Laftanar ya fara yin alkawarin "hankali na shida." Nazarin Klein ya nuna gaskiya — salon wuta ya keta tsarin hankali, kuma salon gane na masana ya yi alama a gaban ya zama iya fahimta shi. Wannan shine recognition-primed decision making a aiki.
Wanda Gary Klein ya ci taro a shekara ta 1985, RPD ya bayyana hanyar sauri ta masana:
Kwafa hali da salon daga shekaru na kwarewa da ganinsa a matsayin al'ada.
Kawo tsakiyar aiki da ta yi aiki a irin wannan hali a baya.
Rarraba shi a zuciyar ka — 'shi zai aiki nan?' — kafin aiyuka.
Idan gudanarwar ta yi kyau, aiki. Idan ba, gyara ta ko jariri zauren na gaba — daya bayan daya, ba a juya-juya ba.
Kungiyar Klein ta yi nazari kan masu gaba 26 (~ shekaru 23 na kwarewa) a matakai 156 na yanke shawara. A ƙasa da 12% ya kwatanta matakai biyu ko fiye. Masana suna gane; ba sa yanke shawara. Wannan shine amsa ga tsarin rational model.
Masanin shakka Daniel Kahneman da masanin hankali Gary Klein sun yi aikin hamayya na shekaru da dama kuma sun buga amsa a shekara ta 2009. Amsa su: hankali zai iya amintarwa kawai idan duk yanayin suke.
Thabta, koyo salon da ka'idoji — ba tashin hankali ba. Firefighting, chess, anesthesiology sun cancanta.
Iya aikatawa tare da bayani mai sahihi da sauri don koyo salon.
Inda waɗannan suka kasa — yanke shawara na dogon lokaci, siyasa, tsarin sabon — hankali mai tsauri shine illusion of validity, kuma kuna bukatar tsari mai tsauri — wanda ke inda kayan aiki kama su Argumentree suke.
NDM shine don masana daya da ke aiki sauri a yankuna da suke sanar. Yanke shawara na ƙungiyoyi yawanci suke da sabanin haka: sabon, mai matukar muhimmanci, mara komai, da raba tsakanin mutane da yawa — yanayin da hankali ke da ƙarancin amintarwa kuma tsari yake da muhimmanci — yankin yanke shawara mai tsauri da collaborative decision making. Argumentree an yi don waɗannan, a argument mapping:
Canja kiran mai kwarewa zuwa hujja mai kallon pro/con da wasu zai iya kallon — don haka 'Ina fahimta' ta zama hujja da kungiya zai iya jarabta.
Idan muhalli ya yi tashin hankali don kiran da ke da amana, kimanta da nuna hujja don kafa shawarar a kan shaida, ba a kan amana ba.
Neman AI ya kamata salon mai kwarewa daga taro da takardu, don haka ilimin salon da aka kamata ba zai lalace lokacin da suka bar zauren.
Kowace shawara ta riaka tarihin hujja da aka yi — mai kallon da aka yiwa bita daga yadda ta lalace.
Kiran da aka yi da amana a cikin yankuna marasa tsinkaya ya yi kama da gaskiya amma ba shi da amana.
Ganewa ta kasa lokacin da hali ta yi kama da wata al'ada amma ba ta yi kama da ita ba.
Tsaya a kan karin farko a kan bayanin da ke karyata shi — a kinyan ga laftanar da ya saki.
Naturalistic decision making (NDM) na karantar da yadda mutane masu kwarewa ke yanke shawara a yanayin duniya — a ƙarƙashin matsin lamba, banbanci, matsayi mai girma, da bayanai marasa kamata — maimakon a cikin zauren labarai na kirkire-kirkire. Nasa abin nuna shi ne cewa masu kwarewa ba sa yi kwatankwacin zauren; suna gane hali a matsayin al'ada da aiki a kan zauren da ya yi aiki.
RPD, wanda aka haɓaka ta masanin binciken Gary Klein a shekara ta 1985, ya bayyana yadda masu kwarewa ke yanke shawara da sauri: suna kwafa hali ta yanzu da salon daga kwarewa, suna gane shi a matsayin al'ada, suna dawo da zauren aiki da ya yi aiki a baya, da kuma suna gudanar da shi a zuciyar su. Idan gudanarwar ta yi kyau, suka aiki; idan ba, suka gyara ko suka jariri zauren na gaba — daya bayan daya, ba a juya-juya ba.
Klein, Calderwood da Clinton-Cirocco sun yi hira da masu kwarewa 26 na fireground commanders (kimanin shekaru 23 na kwarewa a matsakaici) game da 156 na yanke shawara mara kawaida. A ƙasa da 12% na kaso akwai shaida ta kwatankwacin zauren biyu ko fiye. Masu kwarewa suna gane hali a matsayin al'ada da suka je zauren aiki — a kinyan ga salon 'kimanta kowace zauren' na al'ada.
A hadin gwiwa na 'adversarial collaboration,' masanin shakka Daniel Kahneman da mai kare intuition Gary Klein sun amince (2009) cewa intuition na mai kwarewa ya cancanta ne kawai a ƙarƙashin yanayi biyu: (1) muhalli mai tsinkaya tare da salon da ka'idoji, da (2) iya aikatawa tare da bayani mai sahihi da sauri don koyo salon. Firefighting, chess, da anesthesiology sun cancanta; yanayin siyasa na dogon lokaci da kasuwar hannayen jari ba su cancanta — wanda shi ne dalilin da 'intuition' na masu kwarewa ya yi kasa akai-akai.
A'a. Intuition na mai kwarewa (NDM) ya yi sauri amma an gina shi a kan shekaru na kwarewa da salon — ya yi kama da sauri amma an san shi sosai. Yanke shawara na impulsive ya yi sauri ba tare da wannan gini ba: aiki a kan zuciya ko kiran farko ba tare da gane salon da aka koya ba. Dalilin ya yi kama da ko saurin ya dogara ne a kan kwarewa mai gaskiya a cikin yankuna mai tsinkaya ko a kan wani abu.
Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Yanke shawara a kan filin wuta. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 30(6), 576-580.
Karatu na fireground: 26 na ma'aikata, 156 matakai na shawara, zaɓuɓɓuka aka kwatanta a ƙarƙashin 12% na lokuta.
View source →Klein, G. (1998). Albarkatun ikon: Yadda mutane ke yanke shawara. MIT Press.
Mudawwatar yanke shawara-Primed da kisan gida na masu ajiye motoci.
View source →Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Yanayin don mahara Intuitive: Kasa da rashin amincewa. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515-526.
Haɗin gwiwa na adawar game da lokacin da maharan mutum za'a iya amintarwa.
View source →Zsambok, C. E., & Klein, G. (Eds.). (1997). Yanke shawara na asali. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lambobin karatu na NDM bincike filin.
Idan kira shine sabon, mai matukar muhimmanci, da raba tsakanin mutane da yawa, tsari yake fi sauri. Yi hankali na ƙungiyar ku inspectable kuma yanke shawara tare da tsauri a Argumentree.
Farai Kyauta