Consent-based decision making (wacce ake kira consent decision making) ta samo asali ne daga sociocracy kuma ake amfani da ita a Sociocracy 3.0 da Holacracy. Wata takardar tana ci gaba lokacin tana "iri yadda yake, lafiya yadda za'a jarida" — jarabawar ita ce rashin kunci, ba amincewa daga dukkanin mutane ba. Kunci mai ma'ana ita ce wata hujja mai ma'ana, wacce ke cikin takardar, wadda zata lalata aikin tarayya — ba kawai son kai ba, ko "iri yadda zan fi so" ba. Tsarin na yau yau: gabatar da takardar, tambaya don sanin takardar, tarurrukan sauraron tarurruka, fitar da kunci, sannan amincewa. Wannan yasa consent ya fi sauri fiye da amincewa gaba daya don shawarar aiki a cikin tawagi da tarayya, yayin da har yanzu yana tabbatar da kowane murya zai iya toshe wata takardar da ke cutarwa.

Consent-based decision making yanke takardar a lokacin babu wanda yake da kunci, masu ma'ana, ko kuma kunci — ma'aunin shi ne "iri yadda yake, lafiya yadda za'a jarida," ba amincewa daga dukkanin mutane ba. Ta fito ne daga sociocracy kuma an tsara ta don taimakawa tawagi da tarayya su yanke shawara cikin sauri ba tare da kunyar da kunci ba.
An sabunta ta na karshen: 2026-07-04
A consent-based decision making, wata takardar tana amincewa lokacin babu wanda yake da kunci, masu ma'ana, ko kuma kunci — wata hujja mai ma'ana wacce ke cikin takardar wadda zata lalata aikin tarayya. Ma'aunin shi ne "iri yadda yake, lafiya yadda za'a jarida," ba amincewa daga dukkanin mutane ba. Wannan shi ne tsarin shawara na sociocracy kuma yana cikin Sociocracy 3.0 da Holacracy. Yana da banban daga consensus, wacce take neman amincewa daga dukkanin mutane: consent tana da tambaya "akwai kunci ko ba wacce za ta hana mu jarida wannan?
Wanda ya gabatar da tsarin ya bayyana tsarin da aka gabatar, wanda kuma ya yi magana game da bukatar da kungiya ta gano.
Wadanda suke shirin suna tambaya tambayoyi don kila ya fahimci tsarin da aka gabatar. Wannan ba lokacin ba don kungiyar suka ko musu taraya — don haka kawai don tabbatar da kowa ya fahimci abin da ake gabatarwa.
Kowace mutum ya bayar da amsa sauri, don haka mai gabatar da tsarin ya ji ra'ayin kungiya kuma ya iya gyara tsarin kafin a gwaji kin amsa.
Wadanda suke shirin ane su tambaya ko suna da kin amsa. Kowace kin amsa ane aikata don tabbatar da shi, sannan an warware shi — tsarin ane gyara don haka batun an warware shi ba tare da a zabi ba.
Lokacin da babu kin amsa da amana, tsarin ane amince da shi — 'abin da yake isasshe a yanzu, abin da ake isasshe ya jarabta' — yawanci tare da ranar bita don sake duba shi lokacin da akwai jarabta.
Muhimmin mataki shi ne fitar da kunci. Kunci mai ma'ana ita ce wata hujja mai ma'ana wacce ke cikin takardar wadda zata lalata aikin tarayya — ba kawai son kai ba, ko "iri yadda zan fi so" ba. Idan wani mutum yake son wata takardar daban, wannan zai zama wata takardar daban, ba kunci ba.
Consent yanke shawara lokacin tarayya ta bukaci ci gaba ba tare da rugujewa kunci — kuma tana da iyaka, wanda shi ne yasa tarayyar sociocracy ke haɗa ta da tarayya, ayyuka, da tsarin sake duba.
Domin jarabta shine rashin kin amsa da amana maimakon amincewa daga kowa, amincewa yawanci yana kai ga shawara da ake iya aiki da ita sauri fiye da kwararrun kungiya — mai dacewa ga zaɓe mai maimaitawa, na aiki.
Amincewa shine hanyar asali ta 'mawaka' na sociocratic — ƙungiyoyi kanana da manufa da iko. Ya baiwa kila mawaki ikon mulki kai tsaye, yana baiwa kowace mamba ikon toshe tsarin da zai iya cutarwa kungiya.
'Abin da yake isasshe ya jarabta' yana nufin shawara ane yi don sake duba. Amincewa tare da ranar bita yana tuba shawara zuwa jarabta da kungiya zai iya koya daga ita kuma ya gyara, maimakon yin alkawari na dindindin.
Tsarin hujja na Argumentree yana da alaƙa da consent: abin da ke da wahala a consent shi ne fitar da kunci, jarabawa ko mai ma'ana, sannan kuma warware su a rubuce — wannan shi ne abin da ake bukata don wata hanyar shawara da tsari.
Kowace kin amsa yana zama hujja ta farko da aka haɗa da tsarin, tare da hujja da ke bayanta — don haka 'kin amsa mafi girma' ane rubuta shi kuma ane iya kimanta shi, ba a rasa shi a cikin tattaunawa.
Domin kin amsa suna rayu a matsayin hujja ta tsari, mawaki zai iya warware kowace daya — ya gyara tsarin kuma ya rubuta yadda aka warware damuwa — maimakon ya manta da shi.
Lokacin da babu kin amsa da amana, ane rubuta tsarin da aka amince da shi, tare da kin amsa da suka shapewa shi, tare da lokacin — wakilin da ke nuna abin da aka yanke shawara da yaushe.
Shawarar da suka gabata, kin amsa, da sakamako suna nan don ake iya nema, don haka lokacin da shawara 'abin da yake isasshe ya jarabta' ta zo don sake duba, hujja ta asali yana nan.
Argumentree bai tabbatar da wata hanyar shawara ba — tana rubuta hujja don tarayya ta iya yanke shawara tare da kunci da sakamako a rubuce, ba tare da bukata ba.
Hanyar da ke da alaƙa da shawara wadda take neman shawara da kowa zai iya goyi bayanta — kuma yadda take bambanta da 'babu kin amsa' na amincewa.
Aliko na kungiya ya koma ga shawara da za su iya tsaya — kuma rubuta yadda suka iso ga can.
Kallon hanyoyin biyu-bi-bi — lokacin 'babu kin amsa' ya fi 'kowa sun amince', da kuma kinyewa.
Yadda shawarar da aka tsara da aka bayyana take aiki lokacin da kungiya ta kuma bukatar yanke shawara tare.
Shi ne hanyar shawara ta kungiya — wadda ke da mahimmanci ga sociocracy — inda aka amince da tsarin lokacin da babu wanda ya gabatar da kin amsa da hujja. Ma'aunin shine 'abin da yake isasshe a yanzu, abin da yake isasshe ya jarabta', don haka shawara take ci gaba lokacin da babu wanda zai nuna dalili mai kamari cewa zai cutar da manufofin kungiya. Ba ta bukatar amincewa daga kowa.
Kwararrun shawara take neman shawara da kowa zai iya goyi bayanta; kungiya take aiki har sai kowa su ce 'ei.' Amincewa take tambaya madaidaiciya 'ko wanda ya na da dalili mai kamari cewa ba za mu iya jarabta ba?' kuma take ci gaba lokacin da babu wanda ya ce kin amsa. Amincewa yawanci take sauri fiye saboda take gwaji kin amsa maimakon gina amincewa, amma har yanzu take baiwa kowace mamba damar toshe tsarin da zai iya cutarwa kungiya.
Kin amsa da amana shine hujja mai kamari da hujja da ke nuna cewa amincewa da tsarin zai cutar da kungiya — kamar yadda zai iya haɗura cuta ko toshe aikin mawaki. Son kai, 'abin da yake fi kyau,' ko damuwa ba shi kin amsa da amana; zai iya zama tsarin daban nan gaba.
Shi ne hanyar shawara ta sociocracy (sociocratic circle organization), wadda aka gina da aka yi wa inganci ta Gerard Endenburg a Netherlands. Shi ne ake amfani da shi a Sociocracy 3.0 (S3), aikin buɗe da aka tsara, kuma a Holacracy, inda 'integrative decision-making' take aiki ne a kan ilimin kin amsa.
Amincewa take aiki mafi kyau ga shawarar aiki a cikin mawaki da manufa da iko da aka amince da su. Ba ta dacewa lokacin da babu manufa da aka amince da su don a gwaji kin amsa, lokacin da shawara ba ta da komai — wadda kwararrun shawara ko shawarar masana zai iya zama mafi dacewa, ko lokacin da kungiya ta koma yawa don a ji kin amsa daya daya — wadda ke nufin sociocracy take amincewa a cikin mawaka kanana da aka haɗa.
Sociocracy For All — Shawarar da aka amince da ita
Mujalla ta al'umma wadda ke bayyana shawarar da aka amince da ita, kin amsa da amana, da ma'auni 'abin da yake isasshe a yanzu, abin da yake isasshe ya jarabta' a cikin sociocracy.
View source →Sociocracy 3.0 (S3)
Aikin buɗe da aka tsara don haɗin gwiwa da mulki, wadda ke nuna shawarar da aka amince da ita a matsayin hanyar asali.
View source →Tsarin mulki na Holacracy yana amfani da ilimin kin amsa iri ɗaya da sociocratic amincewa don ci gaba da ayyuka da manufofi.
View source →Gerard Endenburg, "Sociocracy: The Organization of Decision-Making" (1998)
Littafi mai mahimmanci wadda ta gabatar da hanyar sociocratic circle da ka'idojin amincewa. Ananbu sunan sa; tambayi ɗan littafi ko sayarwa don samun bugu.
Fitar da kunci a matsayin hujja mai tsari, warware su a rubuce, sannan rubuta shawara — don haka "lafiya yadda za'a jarida" take da alama wacce za'a iya sake duba.
Farai