Tsarin gina tarayyar jama'a yana gudana a matakan biyar: tsayar da tambaya da fitar da kowane matsayi; tattaunawa game da hujjoji na mai zuwa da na adawa; gano fili da keɓantaccen adawa da ke tode shawarar; gyara ko sulhu don magance waɗannan adawan; gwada don tabbatar da shawara. Consensus ya bambanta da kuri'a ta daidaikun mutane (wacce ta ƙare lokacin da fiye da nisaɗu suka amince, ko da yake a kan adawa mai ƙarfi), daga ittifaki (wacce take buƙatar kowa ya amince kai tsaye da kuma kumbura da sauri), da daga goyon bayan (sociocracy's saurin tsarin, inda shawara ta wuce idan babu hujja mai ma'ana — "isa mai zurfi don yanzu, lafiya don jarida"): consensus yake aiki don warware adawan don kowa zai iya goyi bayan shawara ko kuma ba a goyi bayan ba, wanda ke ƙara goyon bayan da ɗorewa fiye da sauri. Hanyoyin hukuma sun hada da Quaker "sense of the meeting," goyon bayan shawara (Gerard Endenburg's sociocracy), Sam Kaner's 8-point Gradients of Agreement scale da "groan zone," da saurin gwaji kamar fist-to-five, stand-aside, da block. Yana da wahala saboda yana daɗe, muryoyi masu ƙarfi zai iya samar da karya tarayyar jama'a, adawan ba a fada ba, kuma ƙungiyoyi ba sa ganin inda suke a zahiri.

Gina tarayyar jama'a ita ce tsarin aiki tare da rukuni don kai ga shawara kowa zai iya goyi bayan — fitar da damuwa, warware adawan, da kai ga zaɓi da goyon bayan da ya dace fiye da kuri'a ta daidaikun mutane.
An sabunta ta karshe: 2026-07-02
Consensus building ba shi ne game da samun ittifaki daga kowa ba — shi ne game da warware adawan da ke tode mutane daga goyon bayan shawara. Rukuni yana fitar da kowane damuwa, gyara shawara don magance su, da tabbatar da cewa kowa zai iya goyi bayan (ko da yake ba a goyi bayan ba). Sakamako shi ne shawara da ta dace.
Tattara dukkan zaɓuɓɓuka da hujjoji a tebur — gami da adireshin tsanani da ke tsaye ba a bayyana su.
Binciki hujjoji na mai zuwa da na adawa ga kowace zaɓi a kan daraja, don haka wasu damuwa suna samuwa maimakon aɓaya su.
Gano abin da ƙungiyar ta riga ta amince da shi, kuma raba adireshin tsanani da ke hana amincewa.
Gyara tsarin — ko tattauna sulhu — don yiwa adireshin tsanani amsa kai tsaye.
Duba idan kowa zai iya goyi bayan yanke shawara ko kada ya hana shi, sannan rubuta shi.
Ta wuce idan fiye da nisfari suka amince — sauri da kuma na zamani, amma har zuwa nisfari na ƙungiyar zasu iya zama masu rinjaye da kuma barin su ba su da tabbaci.
Yana bukatar kowa ya amince cewa shi ne mafi kyawun zaɓi — manda mai ƙarfi, amma ya kasa kuma ya samar da sakamako maras ƙarfi.
Ya warware adireshin tsanani don haka kowa zai iya goyi bayan shawara ko kada ya hana shi — ya dace don samun amincewa da ƙarfi fiye da sauri.
Ta wuce idan babu adireshin tsanani da aka bayyana — "lafiya a yanzu, lafiya don jarida." Madadin sociocracy mai sauri da kuma na zamani.
"Consensus" ya yi vague har sai ka ga hanyoyin da ƙungiyoyi suka gina don yin shi aiki:
The mafi dadewa al'ada: ta hanyar shiru da gudunmawa mai magana, ma'aikaci ya gane ra'ayin taron — ba kuri'a, kuma ba iri daya da kuri'a gaba daya. Zamani na addini na kawance da sociocracy duka suna da ala zuwa gare shi.
Muhimmin sake duba: yanke hukunci ta hanyar "babu kunci" maimakon "kowa ya fi so." Wani yaki ya wuce idan "lafiya a yanzu, kuma lafiya don jarida" — kuma kunci da dalili anayin ganin amfani bayani don kawata yaki, ba kuma kuri'a na son rai. Ya sauri fiye da kuri'a gaba daya kuma ya fi girma.
Kaner ya maye gurbin binary yes/no da 8-point scale daga "Endorsement" zuwa "Kawance tare da kunci," "Tashi gefe," zuwa "Block" — don haka za ka gani ko kawance ta yi da son kai ko kuma an yarda da ita. Muhimmin ra'ayi nasa: kowanne taron do ya wuce "yankin groan" — tsakiyar maraice tsakanin fikra da kawance. Ka manta shi kuma ka samu kawance na yaudara, kawance na karya.
Fist-to-five ya koma kuri'a zuwa ishara na inganci (fist = block, biyar-fingers = yes mai son kai). Stand-aside ya nufin "ba zan goyi bayan haka amma ba zan hana taron" (ta ci gaba); block ya koma kuri'a na kunci don kunci na asali.
Ayiwa daga masanin ilmin halin dan Adam Carl Rogers: kafin ka yi fafutuka ga bangaren ka, ka sake faifayyarin matsafin wani lafiya har ka bangaren wani ya amince da sake faifayyarin ka, suna masa suna na kima ka ke raba, kuma gina yaki daga filayen gama gari. Ya ragu da kai tsaye kuma ya koma kawance a cikin bincike na taron don samun sulhu da bangarorin biyu mallaka.
Shiru an yi la'akari da shi a matsayin amincewa; mutanen da ba su da amincewa suna bayyana adireshin tsanani suka fito daga baya.
Shugabannin da muryoyin da suka fi ƙarfi suna yanke shawara kafin wasu suka yi la'akari.
Masu hana gaskiya ba su bayyana a tebur ba, don haka ba a warware su gaskiya ba.
Babu hanyar ganin inda ƙungiyar take, don haka za ta iya kuskure shiru da amincewa.
Argumentree yana ƙara consensus yaɗa badala da amincewa:
Bishiyoyin hujjoji na pro/con suna bayyana kowane matsayi — gami da masu hana mara bayyana — a cikin gani ɗaya mai tsari, don haka babu abin da ya tsaya ba a bayyana.
Wadanda suka yi rajista suna ƙididdige hujjoji; ƙididdigar suna tattara daga bishi zuwa mizani na net pro-da-con, don haka za ka iya gani ko amincewa ta gaskiya ta wanzu — ba kuskure daga shiru ba.
Sarki na tsarin sulhu (tare da BATNA/WATNA framing) ya ba ƙungiyar damar aiki ta hanyar adireshin tsanani na musamman don wani sulhu da duka bangarorin zasu amince da shi.
Kowace sulhu an amince da ita ko kuma an hana ta kai tsaye kuma an rubuta, don haka amincewa ta ke kan rikodi — ba a yanke shawara daga shiru ba.
Aikin hujjoji na sigar da kuma rayuwar tattaunawa suna riƙe rikodin kamari na yadda amincewa ta wanzu — don haka ba a sake tattaunawa ba.
Fassarar harsuna 66 na hujjoji da sarki na tsarin sulhu ya ba ƙungiyoyin duniya damar samun amincewa a cikin harshe su na asali yayin da suke raba shawara ɗaya.
Gina tarayyar jama'a shi ne ɓangare ɗaya na collaborative decision making da decision-making process. Ka ga shi a DAO governance, public policy, da team meetings.
Gina amincewa shi ne tsarin aikin ƙungiya zuwa shawara da kowa zai iya goyi bayan — ko kuma a zabi ya yi wa ƙungiya barazana. Maimakon rinjaye ya ɓata wasu, ƙungiya ta bayyana damuwa, ta gyara tsarin don yiwa damuwa amsa, kuma ta haɗu kan zaɓi da amincewa mai ƙarfi da ƙarfi.
Tsarin gina amincewa na yau da kullun: (1) bayyana tambaya da dage kowane matsayi; (2) tattauna hujjoji na mai zuwa da na adawa ga kowace zaɓi bude; (3) gano fili da adireshin tsanani da ke hana amincewa; (4) gyara ko tattauna sulhu don yiwa adireshin tsanani amsa; (5) jarraba don amincewa da tabbatar. Muhimmin abu shi ne yin damuwa mai bayyana da kuma warware su, ba kuri'a su ba.
Kuri'ar jam'iyya ta ƙare lokacin da fiye da nisfari suka amince, ko da yake babban ƙungiya mai adawa. Dukkan amincewa yana bukatar kowa ya amince cewa shi ne mafi kyawun zaɓi — manda mai ƙarfi, amma ya kasa kuma ya samar da sakamako maras ƙarfi. Amincewa ta ke tsakiya: ƙungiya ta aiki don yiwa adireshin tsanani amsa don haka kowa zai iya goyi bayan shawara ko kuma zabi ya yi wa ƙungiya barazana. Amincewa ta dace don samun amincewa da ƙarfi fiye da sauri.
Amincewa ta yiwa ta wahala saboda ta ɗauki lokaci, muryoyin da suka fi ƙarfi zasu iya samar da amincewa mara gaskiya da ƙungiyoyin da ba su da amincewa, adireshin tsanani na yawa ba a bayyana su ba, kuma babu hanyar ganin inda ƙungiya take. Ba tare da tsari da zai ɗauki kowane hujja da kuma mizani na amincewa ba, ƙungiyoyin za su yi kuskure shiru da amincewa da kuma sake tattaunawa da shawarar da aka yanke.
Software na gina amincewa ya ba ƙungiya wuri mai tsari da kuma raba don bayyana hujjoji, tattauna, da mizani inda amincewa ta ke. Argumentree ya shirya tattaunawa zuwa bishiyoyin hujjoji na pro/con, ya canza ƙididdigar mutum ɗaya zuwa mizani na net pro-da-con, ya goyi bayan tsarin sulhu (tare da BATNA/WATNA framing), ya bi diddigin amincewa mai bayyana na kowace sulhu, kuma ya riƙe rikodin kamari na yadda amincewa ta wanzu.
Kaner, S. (2014). Mai ba da Jagora zuwa Shiri-shirin yanke shawara (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
The Gradients of Agreement scale and the groan zone.
Endenburg, G. (1998). Sociocracy: Tsarin yanke shawara. Eburon.
Consent-based decision making - deciding by no reasoned objections.
Buck, J., & Villines, S. (2007). Mu the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy. Sociocracy.info Press.
The practical consent principle: good enough for now, safe enough to try.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Houghton Mifflin.
BATNA and principled negotiation, underlying structured compromise.
Sheeran, M. J. (1983). Beyond Majority Rule: Voteless Decisions in the Religious Society of Friends. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting.
The Quaker sense of the meeting, the oldest formal consensus practice.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin.
The empathy-first communication ideas behind Rogerian common ground.
Fitar da kowane adawa, maida inda rukuni ke, da kuma tabbatar da amincewa aiki — tare da Argumentree.
Farai Kyauta